By Matthew Lau (AIMS Author)
- Troy Media, 01 November 2018
Canadians experience daily the enormous economic benefits of competition. For most consumer goods, over time, Canadians pay less and get more. Businesses compete to offer customers the best products at the lowest prices; those with offerings that consumers judge unsatisfactory eventually are forced to close and go out of business. As long as there is competition, consumers are the kings.
Take the example of Sears. In a 2016 study, economist Don Boudreaux and his colleagues compared prices between Sears catalogues from 1976 and 2011. Over these 35 years, the prices of consumer goods fell dramatically. For example, the price of an electric guitar fell 61 percent, the price of women’s jeans fell 39 percent, and televisions and microwave ovens were almost 90 percent cheaper (in real terms, adjusted for changes in the overall consumer price index) in 2011 compared to 1976.
In addition, over this time period the quality of electric guitars, clothing, and appliances that Sears sold improved significantly. But even though consumers were paying much less and getting much more, Sears today is in bankruptcy because consumers found they could pay even less for even better goods, and more conveniently, elsewhere. Such are the benefits of market competition to consumers.
However, questionable government policy often deprives Canadians of competition when accessing the most important goods and services. In Atlantic Canada, this is the case for schooling. Unless parents are willing and able to make a significant financial sacrifice to pay twice for schooling –once with their taxes and then again for private tuition– they have no choice but to send their children to a government-run school.
The results of this government monopoly? Unlike in the competitive markets for consumer goods where over time customers pay less and get more, in Atlantic Canada taxpayers have been paying more for schooling while student achievement is either flat or declining. Consider the results from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), which evaluates the academic performance of 15-year-old students in developed countries.
According to the 2016 report from the Council of Ministers of Education, in Atlantic Canada, reading scores have been flat in each province since 2000, math scores declined in every province except PEI since 2003, and science scores fell in Newfoundland and Labrador and remained flat in the Maritimes since 2006. Furthermore, in 2015 all four Atlantic provinces scored below the national average in all three subject areas.
Despite worsening results, Atlantic taxpayers have been paying more. In 2014-15, all of the Atlantic provinces except PEI spent more per student in public schools than the national average, and real per student spending increased by between 26 percent (Nova Scotia) and 42 percent (PEI) over a period of just nine years.
Meanwhile in provinces with greater degrees of school choice, taxpayers and students both reap the benefits. A recent report by Paige MacPherson for the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies highlighted the case of charter schools – independent, government-funded, non-profit schools that do not charge tuition – in Alberta. Over the past decade, students in charter schools achieved higher provincial test scores than private school students, who in turn outperformed public school students.
The demand for more school choice and alternatives to the public school system is immense. In 2015, the CBC reported that one Alberta charter school had a waiting list of over 11,000. Parents and children benefit from higher quality education, and taxpayers benefit too. The Alberta government spends about one-third less per student in charter schools compared to the public schools.
Just as market competition allows Canadians to pay less and get more when it comes to consumer goods, the Alberta experience shows that increasing competition in schooling can improve quality while reducing costs. Adopting the Alberta charter school model in Atlantic provinces would be a good first step in giving parents and children more choice and allowing them to enjoy the benefits of competition.
Matthew Lau writes for the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies (AIMS.ca).