Education survey should not be taken too lightly
The Daily Gleaner, March 15 editorial said the "The public.. is making public education its business." and asked why educators would ask the public to "ignore this report.” The editorial also asks the NBTA to “place their concerns firmly, clearly, and rationally on the table. Only then will the public be able to dismiss and condemn or accept and praise the AIMS work.”
Report card: shooting messenger won’t help
AIMS is front and centre in the Atlantic Canada media this week following the release of its Report Card on Atlantic Canadian high schools. The Report Card, which ranks regional high schools' performance, has ignited a heated debate over not only the results, but also the impact the study will have on the education system. Critics inside the education establishment have gone so far as to tell teachers not to even read the study. Supporters are saying this type of external review has been far too long coming.
AIMS study flawed, hurtful to students
The Principal of Oxford Regional Schools reacts to the AIMS Report Card on Atlantic Canadian High Schools.
Grading the report card
Here is a sampling of the debate over the Report Card on Atlantic Canadian High Schools released by the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies. These letters appeared in the Wednesday, March 12, 2003 edition of the Halifax Chronicle Herald.
School ratings raise hackles
Hopefully, future discussion of the AIMS rankings will shed a little less heat, and a little more light, on the education system.
School ratings a welcome tool
We say: N.B. should adopt and encourage the approach to evaluating the education system that the Atlantic Institute of Market Studies has initiated